Developments in the Japanese Nuclear Reactor Situation

Updates from the University of Michigan, Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences department

Fukushima upgraded to Level 7 on INES scale

by healthphysx

This informative article by NPR explains why the Fukushima incident is not nearly as severe as the Chernobyl accident of 1986, despite being reclassified as Level 7 on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale. Level 7 is the highest possible value of the scale.

The term “terabecquerel” in the article is a measure of activity, a measure of the rate of radioactive decay of a substance. The metric prefix “tera” means one trillion and “becquerel” means one radioactive decay per second. One gram of iodine-131 results in approximately 4,600 TBq, where one gram of cesium-137 is about 3.215 TBq.

Note that this change has been made in retrospect, due to a re-examination of the events that occurred in mid-March, not due to any more recent developments.

What is potassium iodide?

by healthphysx

Potassium iodide (also known by its chemical formula, KI) is a salt that is typically used to prevent the body from accumulating significant amounts of iodine-131, also known as radioiodine. If radioiodine uptake occurs, it may take several weeks to be completely removed from the body, during which DNA damage occurs in the thyroid gland. After several years, thyroid cancer may develop.

First and foremost, we cannot stress enough that if you live outside Japan, you do not need potassium iodide. Iodine-131 has been detected across the United States in small amounts, levels so low that they are close to the lower limit of detectability for the radiation detectors being used. As stated previously in this blog, we can detect radiation at levels far lower than those that would be harmful. Many state health departments, including the Michigan Department of Community Health, maintain an inventory of potassium iodide for public distribution in the case of a nuclear accident in which radioiodine is released.

As with all iodine-containing compounds, potassium iodide is thyroid-seeking in humans. Healthy adults require approximately 100 micrograms of iodine per day, and most people ingest at least this much in table salt (sodium chloride), to which iodine is typically added to make iodized salt. A typical dose of KI meant for radioiodide uptake prevention is 130 milligrams, of which 100 milligrams is iodine, far greater than what the body typically needs. This saturates the thyroid, after which any additional iodine ingested, radioactive or not, is passed out of the body before it can accumulate in the thyroid.

Potassium iodide is most effective against exposure from radioiodine if taken before exposure, but some protection is provided even if taken several hours later. However, if more than a day has passed since exposure, potassium iodide should not be taken. Otherwise, excretion of the radioiodine by the body will be delayed.

Potassium iodide does not protect against any other sources of radiation. Therefore it should only be taken on the advice of public health officials, who can detect radioiodine and inform you if potassium iodine is necessary.

Even in the case of airborne radioiodine contamination, potassium iodide may not be necessary. If radioiodine is present in the air, it will eventually settle onto the ground, where it will settle onto leafy, above-ground vegetables. These are eaten by animals, primarily cows, causing radioiodine to concentrate in milk (and meat to a lesser extent). Swift action by local and national government regulators to ban affected food products can prevent iodine from reaching the body before potassium iodine is needed. Had milk been banned after the Chernobyl accident, far fewer thyroid cancers would have resulted from it. As iodine-131 has a half-life of approximately eight days, the affected food pathways will be clean after three months. Ten half-lives is a conservative guideline to follow in order to allow nearly all harmful radioisotopes to decay, which is 80 days in this case.

The intake of potassium iodide tablets is recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection for the following dose levels:

0 – 12 years of age and pregnant women: 50 mSv and above
13 – 45 years of age (including breastfeeding mothers): 250 mSv and above

Adults of 45 years are recommended not to take iodine tablets by the ICRP, as the risk of serious thyroid disorders due to megadoses of iodine is greater than the radiation risk due to inhalation of radioiodine. Cancer develops slowly, and in general carcinogenesis is much more dangerous to future health if it occurs earlier in life.

The most risk from radioiodine is caused by doses greater than the dose recommendations above, but less than 10 gray of organ dose. Above that value, the thyroid is destroyed, rendering thyroid cancer development impossible. Radioiodine can be administered purposefully in large doses to thyroid cancer patients, specifically to destroy the thyroid and the cancer along with it. The thyroid gland is not necessary to live.

Although potassium iodide is usually harmless, the thyroid may react to large doses of iodine, causing goiters and other problems. Although seafood allergies are often confused for iodine allergy, as seafood contains high amounts of iodine, seafood allergies are typically caused by proteins including parvalbumins in fish and tropomyosins in crustaceans and mollusks. Only very rarely are humans allergic to iodine itself, though this should not be taken to mean that taking large doses of iodine entails no risk of side effects.

Even if you feel that you should buy potassium iodide “just to be safe”, there is no need for members of the public outside of Japan to do so, and taking it against recommendations can cause health problems. These problems are outweighed by the protection from thyroid cancer in cases of high doses of radioiodine exposure, but that is not the case outside of the Fukushima exclusion zone at this time. The best defense against radioiodide is prevention of the distribution of contaminated food items, which should be practiced at a governmental level.

Today: UT Knoxville webcast public discussion

by coldplasma

The nuclear engineering department at UT Knoxville will be hosting a public discussion about the events at Fukushima. The panel, as described by the press release, appears to cover a wide range of disciplines. The whole discussion will be webcast, and questions from the public can be submitted. For more details, see the quote below:

On Tuesday, March 29, 6:00 – 8:00 pm, a panel of experts from academia, the national laboratory community, industry, and radiological emergency response will discuss the earthquake- and tsunami-caused nuclear events. The panel discussion, which is open to the public, will be in The Tennessee Auditorium in the Carolyn P. Brown Memorial University Center on the University of Tennessee Campus, Knoxville, TN.  The Panel Moderator will Professor Howard Hall, UTK Department of Nuclear Engineering and the Howard H. Baker Center for Public Policy.  The panel discussion will be webcast in real time.  You can view the live webcast of this presentation at the following link  – http://160.36.161.128/UTK/Viewer/?peid=125414c34db64c9ab995a592f4fd5fa0 .  You must have a media player such as Windows Media installed on your computer.
We will also accept questions from the Internet for the panelists.  Please email your questions to howard.hall@utk.edu, and please provide your name and affiliation in your email message.

Update: I’ve just received the list of speakers. At the panel will be: Jeff Chapman, President of Knoxville Chapter of the American Nuclear Society; Russell “Rusty” West, VP of Nuclear Operations, TVA; Lawrence Townsend, Robert M. Condra Professor of Nuclear Engineering, UTK; Al Wiley, Director of the Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education (ORISE) Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS); Tom Rucker, President of the East Tennessee Health Physics Society; Daniel Hollenbach, SpectraTech; Howard Hall, Professor and UTK/ORNL Governor’s Chair in Nuclear Security.  The Panel Moderator will be Professor Howard Hall.

UC Berkley air and water sampling

by coldplasma

I-131 concentrations at UC Berkley

Measurement of iodine-131 concentrations in air by the UC Berkley Nuclear Engineering department.

It turns out that the Nuclear Engineering department at UC Berkley maintains an air and water sampling station. They’ve been posting the results of gamma spectroscopy since March 18th. The page features a nice description of their methods and an explanation of the results. I’d like to emphasize a point that they make further down on their page, just “because we can detect radiation does not mean it is harmful.” The amounts being measured are extremely low and do constitute a risk.

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/UCBAirSamplingSetup

What is a sievert (Sv)?

by coldplasma

Anyone who has been paying attention to the news reports coming from Japan have seen radiation being measured in the unit Sv (sievert). Most people that we have spoken with have little knowledge about what this unit really measures and have even less of an appreciation for big 1.0 Sv really is. Here, we will try to lay out a short and self-contained description.

The blanket term “radiation” really refers to several different types of particles that may all possess an arbitrary amount of energy (if you’re familiar with subatomic particles these should all sound familiar, if not don’t panic):

  1. Alpha – helium nuclei
  2. Beta – single electrons
  3. Gamma – high energy light
  4. Neutrons

The radiation dose equivalent to an individual, measured in Sv, is a number that describes the amount of damage caused by radiation regardless of the type, energy, or tissue affected. The dose equivalent is found by taking the absorbed dose, a measurable quantity, and multiplying it by weighting factors based on the type of radiation, its energy, and the tissue affected. The weighting factors are generated with empirical data on the effects of radiation and was recommended by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). Recommendations on allowable exposure are often published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).

The issue is further complicated by whether the dose is delivered in a short period of time (on the order of days), or over longer periods of time. In the former case, high exposure presents the risk of acute effects such as the burns suffered by the TEPCO employees last week, or radiation sickness at higher levels. In the latter case, prolonged elevated exposure may increase the likelihood of developing cancer. While the development of cancer can be influenced by external factors (radiation, genetic predisposition, smoking, etc.), a large number of people will develop cancer at some point in their lives regardless of radiation exposure which makes it difficult to assign responsibility. As mentioned earlier, 100 mSv can be thought of as a 0.8% increase in likelihood of developing cancer. For reference, the average dose to a person over a year ranges from 1.0 to 3.0 mSv.

Recently, Randall Munroe, creator of the popular webcomic xkcd which typically integrates mathematics and physics into its humor, created an illustration that gives a good appreciation for how different radiation doses can affect an individual. The values are quite accurate. It should be noted, however, that the dose equivalents listed in the red portion of the chart are only accurate if they are applied to the full body. The body can survive much higher doses if applied only to particular organs, and often doses in the tens of Sv are applied to tumors in the course of radiation cancer treatment.

Randall Munroe's chart of various levels of radiation exposure and their consequences.

Photos from inside a boiling water reactor

by coldplasma

Last week the TVA hosted Michael Mercier of The Hunstville Times, on a tour of the Browns Ferry nuclear power station (designed around the same time as the Fukushima Dai-ichi units). During this time, Mercier took a number of high-resolution photos that should be of interest to anyone who wishes to see what the inside of the buildings housing the nuclear reactor looks like.

http://www.tva.com/news/pix/index.htm

Significant exposure to three TEPCO employees

by coldplasma

TEPCO has reported that 3 of its employees received approximately 170 mSv worth of radiation to their legs. The workers have been transferred to a medical facility where they are under examination for possible radiation burns. The primary type of radiation involved here, beta particles, are high-energy electrons. This level of exposure, while high, is still approximately 1/5 of what is required for the lowest level symptoms of Acute Radiation Syndrome. According to the 3rd edition of B. Shleien’s “The Health Physics and Radiation Handbook,” 100 mSv is associated with a 0.8% increase in likelihood of developing cancer.

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11032503-e.html

NRC launches review of US power plant safety

by coldplasma

The NRC has issued a press release stating that they will begin a review nuclear power plant safety in the US following the events in Japan. They appear to be in the process of establishing a task force which will be responsible for providing a short and long-term analysis of the events. According to the press release the task force will be composed of “senior managers and former NRC experts,” but no names have been released yet.

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2011/11-055.pdf

NISA Seismic Damage Information (48th Release)

by coldplasma

Once again, NISA has updated their damage assessment as of 1230JST, March 24th. Each iteration now includes much more information than the initial releases. Data released now includes trends in observed radiation levels and important reactor parameters. Many of the control rooms at Fukushima Dai-ichi are now receiving offsite power, but in most cases this just means they’re able to turn on the lights and full power has not been restored.

http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/files/en20110324-2.html

March 26: Nuclear Energy Town Hall Meeting

by coldplasma

Several professors from the department will be participating in a town hall discussion on nuclear energy. This event is open to the public. Questions about all aspects of nuclear energy are welcomed. The event is sponsored by the University’s student chapter of the American Nuclear Society. More details can be found at the link below.

http://ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=8316